Rising to the challenge Challenge is a word that looms
large in my mind as I look back on 2001. During the year, as we celebrated
CIP's 30th anniversary, we were faced with challenges far beyond those
envisaged in our founding charter.
CIP and the other Future Harvest Centers of the Consultative Group on
International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) were being asked to increase
our relevance as agents of sustainable development by significantly
expanding our impact on poverty and the environment. At the same time, we
were experiencing shortfalls that reflected a tilt away from agricultural
research in the development funding balance.
Yet we were determined to rise to the challenge. In the words of our
Chairman, Ian Johnson, "Put simply, sustainable development is . . .
not just a moral imperative. . . Rather, it has become a global strategic
priority for the survival of our planet."
At the system level, we began to forge new, high-impact research programs
targeting complex issues of global and regional importance. Appropriately
named Challenge Programs, these are founded on innovative partnerships
linking the Future Harvest Centers among themselves, as well as with
numerous other actors. CIP has taken the lead in formulating two of these
programs, while actively seeking ways to contribute to others in areas
where we have relevant expertise.
Meanwhile, CIP staff and management were assessing our achievements over
three decades to extract the lessons on which we would base our
institutional strategy for moving forward. This Annual Report presents
several illustrative examples from work under way in 2001. Insects feel
the heat (page 45), for example, illustrates how CIP's strong linkages and
our expertise in integrated pest management, steadily developed over the
years through research on intensive potato and sweetpotato production
systems, are allowing us to nurture new systemwide efforts to deal with
climate change.
Waste not, want not (page 37) shows how our research on root and tuber
products and processing, firmly grounded in participatory processes, and
our collaboration with other Future Harvest Centers on issues ranging from
water management to waste disposal, are coming together to make a
difference in the lives of urban dwellers and farmers.
In Heading for the Summit (page 27), we see how support to new
institutional approaches in the Andes and alliances with diverse partners
to unravel the complexities of mountain ecosystems have made us the
CGIAR's center of choice to convene the Global Mountain Program. And
Pesticide poisoning (page 17) shows how the powerful data gathering and
analysis tools designed to support decision making in complex mountain
environments not only are helping to curb serious damage to farmers'
well-being, environments and incomes; they also have wide potential for
application across the world's fragile - and vital - mountain ecosystems.
Tapping into biodiversity (page 55) demonstrates how CIP's germplasm
collections, at the heart of our research, continue to be a key source of
impact. CIP-generated potato varieties have spread throughout China
answering urgent food and income needs for hundreds of thousands of people
(Cooperation pays, page 65). And our experience with crop conservation and
improvement have helped us to turn the hardy, yet often disparaged,
sweetpotato from a last-choice subsistence crop into a vital weapon in the
battle to end micronutrient deficiency in Sub-Saharan Africa (Nutritious
and delicious, page 9).
As we evaluate these achievements we are confident, but not complacent.
Experience has shown us that the challenge of sustainable development will
not be met with a simple sum of accomplishments, no matter how impressive
these are. If we are to respond effectively to the "global strategic
priority" described by Ian Johnson - generating concerted impact on
the interrelated issues of poverty, hunger, health and environment - we
need to use formulas that will greatly increase the power of our successes
to produce change.
Two crucial questions continue to emerge: How are we to produce this wide
impact with ever-narrowing resources and in a more tightly focused
research environment? How are we, with our mission to conduct agricultural
research of excellence, to broaden our boundaries without stepping out of
our bounds?
We have found our answer in convergence.
Our future actions - much like our achievements in the past - must be
solidly founded on partnerships that will allow us to take our research
further, broaden its scope or complete its cycle. In this way, we can have
an impact in areas that are otherwise beyond our reach and we can close
the gaps that would allow our technologies to fall through the cracks
somewhere along the food or policy chain.
By cultivating innovative alliances we can ensure not only more food, but
more purchasing power through value-adding activities, less dependence on
external inputs and greater local competence. By building on
complementarities and avoiding redundancy, we can translate increases in
soil productivity and curbs on degradation into more secure habitats with
healthier, more productive people, capable of making the decisions that
will bring them out of subsistence into self-reliance.
The challenge may, at times, seem daunting. But through partnership we
hope to turn sustainable development from an admirable concept into an
attainable goal.

Hubert Zandstra
Director General