![]() | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cleaning Water for a Healthier Environment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Early this year a backyard reservoir was
constructed in Carapongo, Lima with the aim to improve human health, the
natural environment and household income. Based on previous indications of
contamination of the Rimac River, one of three sources of irrigation water
for Lima agriculture, a project has undertaken an evaluation of irrigation
water quality, to determine the presence of heavy metals, bacteria and
parasites. Whilst heavy metals were not found to be a major problem, the
water had high levels of e-coli bacteria and parasites, mainly coming from
untreated
domestic wastewater released into the river. The presence of these
contaminants on vegetables indicates a potentially serious health problem
for consumers. As a consequence, Urban Harvest and partners, by
using a participatory research approach, installed a small pilot backyard
reservoir, 185 cubic meters, to test the feasibility of using aerobic y
anaerobic treatment technologies on a small water reservoir to clean the
contaminated river water. The process begins when water enters the reservoir and is left
static for about ten days, during which time the bacteria are eliminated
through aerobic chemical processes and parasites removed through
sedimentation. As part of the pilot study water from the treatment process
and untreated river water were compared as irrigation sources for
vegetables. The results have shown that the reservoir has cleared 98 percent
of bacteria and eliminated all parasites from the river water. When radish
and lettuce where tested for contaminants, those planted in treated water
had up to 97 percent less bacteria (well below permitted limits) while the
parasites were practically absent in both crops (see table 2).
The loss of productive
farmland occupied by the reservoir results in a net loss of about S/.500
($150) to the farmer. To explore alternative economic opportunities, fish
(tilapia) production in the reservoir is being assessed. Projections of
potential net earnings from sale of fingerlings and mature fish is S/.1750
($520). In addition to this benefit, irrigation with reservoir water appears
to have had a beneficial effect both on rate of emergence and growth and on
the uniformity of the crop, with higher percentages of marketable products
available sooner than with use of river water. This difference is still
under evaluation (see table 3). The
small reservoir has been shown to have multiple benefits, and is replicable
in the area. Working with local
producers, Urban Harvest is therefore in the process of implementing other
reservoirs with the capacity of irrigating up to 70 hectares with clean
water. Table 1. Bacteria
evaluation CF/100ml
According
to the General Water Law, a maximum level of bacteria in CF/100ml, for
irrigation water at 1000CF/100ml
Table 2. Parasite
evaluation parasites/ 100g
Table 3. Economic
comparison of crops irrigated with reservoir and river water
Both
areas of cultivation 472.3 m 2 Significant
difference, p<0.05
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| To subscribe or unsubscribe email us: urbanharvest@cgiar.org | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| http://www.cipotato.org/urbanharvest | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © 2000-2005 Urban Harvest - CGIAR System-wide Initiative for Urban and Peri Urban Agriculture |